This browser does not support the Video element.
Court will allow cameras in Trump GA trial
New developments this week in the legal challenges against the former President include a trial date of March 4 in Washington, D.C. and news that the judge will allow cameras and Live streaming of the case in Georgia. Political expert Stephen Farnsworth breaks down the impact on the case.
DENVER (AP) - A liberal group on Wednesday filed a lawsuit to bar former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot in Colorado, arguing he is ineligible to run for the White House again under a rarely used clause in the U.S. Constitution aimed at candidates who have supported an "insurrection."
The lawsuit, citing the 14th Amendment, is likely the initial step in a legal challenge that seems destined for the U.S. Supreme Court. The complaint was filed on behalf of six Republican and unaffiliated Colorado voters by the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
It will jolt an already unsettled 2024 primary campaign that features the leading Republican candidate facing four separate criminal cases.
RELATED: Trump’s comments risk tainting a jury in federal election subversion case, special counsel says
Liberal groups have demanded that states’ top election officials bar Trump under the clause that prohibits those who "engaged in an insurrection or rebellion" against the Constitution from holding higher office. None has taken that step, looking for guidance from the courts on how to interpret a clause that has only been used a handful of times since the 1860s.
This browser does not support the Video element.
Trump attorneys due in court, trial date set
Trump attorneys appeared in court on Monday for Donald Trump's federal case in Washington. A judge set a trial date for March 4, 2024. Trump's attorneys argued that an April 2026 trial date was necessary due to large amount of evidence needed to be reviewed.
While a few fringe figures have filed thinly written lawsuits in a few states citing the clause, the litigation Wednesday was the first by an organization with significant legal resources. It may lead to similar challenges in other states, holding out the potential for conflicting rulings that would require the Supreme Court to settle.
Colorado’s secretary of state, Democrat Jena Griswold, said in a statement that she hoped "this case will provide guidance to election officials on Trump’s eligibility as a candidate for office."
The lawsuit contends the case is clear, given the attempt by then-President Trump to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden and his support for the assault of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The Republican has said he did nothing wrong in his actions.
RELATED: Trump campaign says he's raised more than $7 million after Georgia booking
The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, helped ensure civil rights for freed slaves — and eventually for all people in the United States. But it also was used to prevent former Confederate officials from becoming members of Congress after the Civil War and taking over the government against which they had just rebelled.
The clause cited in the lawsuit allows Congress to lift the ban, which it did in 1872 as the political will to continue to bar former Confederates dwindled. The provision was almost never used after that.
This browser does not support the Video element.
Trump case: How many codefendants surrendered
Donald Trump turned himself in to authorities in Atlanta to be booked on criminal charges over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia. Trump and his 18 of his co-defendants have been surrendering throughout the week at the Fulton County Jail. So far, 11 of his codefendants have been booked. Nine of them, including Rudy Giuliani, had surrendered by Wednesday, August 23. Two more allies of the former president, Mark Meadows and Floyd Harrison, turned themselves in hours ahead of Trump. The remaining seven codefendants have until midday on Friday to voluntarily surrender, or face arrest. More LiveNOW from FOX streaming video
CREW and law professors of both parties contend the amendment is clear and is a qualification for president, just as the Constitution's mandate that a candidate for the White House must be at least 35 years old and a natural born citizen.
But others note there is much unsettled about the provision and that a case involving this issue has not reached the justices in Washington.
The clause cites "presidential electors," but not presidents themselves, as being disqualified if they previously swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and then broke it. There is a debate among some experts about whether Trump's acts constitute an "insurrection" under the language of the amendment.
RELATED: Donald Trump Georgia jail records: Height, weight listed has social media buzzing
In its complaint, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington asked the court to expedite the matter so it can be resolved before the state's primary ballot is set on Jan. 5 2024. "We understand that there’s great interest in states across this country about this question, and it needs to be resolved expeditiously so there’s clarity," said Donald Sherman, CREW's chief counsel, told reporters in a teleconference.
A Trump spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the suit.
This browser does not support the Video element.
Biden on Trump's mugshot: 'Handsome guy'
President Joe Biden made his first public comments about former president Donald Trump's mugshot. When asked if he'd seen it, President Biden replied, "I did see it on television, handsome guy." Biden answered several questions from reporters outside of a workout class while on vacation in Lake Tahoe. He also spoke about the Republican debate and the plane crash that killed Wagner boss Yevgeny Prigozhin. More LiveNOW from FOX streaming video
The 14th Amendment was used last year to bar from office a New Mexico county commissioner who entered the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. That was the first time it was used in 100 years. In 1919, Congress refused to seat a socialist, contending he gave aid and comfort to the country’s enemies during World War I.
Another liberal group, Free Speech For People, unsuccessfully tried to use the provision to prevent Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina from running for reelection last year.
The judge overseeing Greene’s case ruled in her favor. Cawthorn’s case became moot after he was defeated in his primary.
CREW said it expects to file more cases in other states and anticipates that other groups may do so as well. It picked Colorado, its leaders said, because the state allows ballot challenges to go directly to court and it assembled a prominent roster of plaintiffs, including a former Republican leader of both houses of the state legislature and a conservative columnist for the Denver Post.
There was another reason, noted Sherman — in 2015, a Guyana-born naturalized citizen lost his lawsuit to be included on the state's presidential primary ballot, failing to convince a federal magistrate that the constitution's requirement that he be a natural-born citizen was unfair.
A federal appeals judge upheld that ruling barring him from the ballot. The judge was Neil Gorsuch, now on the U.S. Supreme Court.
This story has been corrected to reflect that the name of the group filing the lawsuit is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, not Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington.